Escalation Triggers: What NOT To Do
Authoritarian governments often deliberately provoke violence to justify crackdowns. Every action you take should be evaluated against one question: Does this give authorities a pretext for escalation?
Why This Document Matters
How Authoritarian Governments Manufacture Pretexts
"While healthy democratic actors always eschew civil violence, autocrats either deliberately look the other way or even intentionally inflame politically useful violence. Such outbreaks can offer political cover for restrictions on civil liberties or the expansion of coercive security measures."
Specific Tactics Governments Use
1. Manufacturing Emergencies
- - Deploying military or federal forces in response to minor incidents
- - Declaring states of emergency to expand executive power
- - Using inflammatory language to escalate tensions ("violent mobs," "insurrectionists")
2. Provoking Violence Through Aggressive Enforcement
- - Militarized responses to peaceful protests
- - Use of tear gas, flash bangs, and physical force against non-threatening crowds
- - Hoping protesters will fight back, creating footage for propaganda
3. Deploying Agent Provocateurs
- - Individuals planted to encourage violence within movements
- - Designed to give authorities legal grounds for repression
- - Goal: Turn public opinion against the movement
4. Dehumanizing Target Groups
- - Creating "enemy" narratives about specific populations
- - Inflaming public fear to justify harsh measures
- - Using media to spread disinformation
Historical Examples
| Country | Year | Tactic Used | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 2016 | Manufactured coup attempt | Justified mass arrests, dismantled democratic institutions |
| Nicaragua | 2018 | Used "shock force" gangs against protesters | Protesters who fought back faced severe legal consequences |
| Tunisia | 2023 | Scapegoated migrants for social problems | Sparked violence, justified authoritarian expansion |
Agent Provocateurs: Identification and Counter-Tactics
"Agents provocateurs are individuals planted among activists to masquerade as protesters, but are actually paid to coax movements into using violence."
Why Governments Use Them
Red Flags: How to Identify Potential Provocateurs
| Warning Sign | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Advocating for "low-level violence" | This is their primary tactic |
| Denouncing nonviolent activists as "not radical enough" | Goal is to split the movement |
| Glib, charismatic strangers appearing suddenly | Earned trust should take time |
| Pushing inexperienced people toward illegal acts | Classic entrapment setup |
| Dressed differently but trying too hard to fit in | May wear police boots, similar clothing |
| Working in pairs or small teams | They often operate together for security |
| No verifiable history in the movement | Ask around — does anyone know them? |
| Proposing actions that would provide great footage for authorities | Think: what would the evening news show? |
Counter-Tactics That Work
The "Sit Down" Strategy (Serbia 2020)
When violent clashes begin, everyone immediately sits down. Provocateurs become easily identifiable as they remain standing and aggressive.
Surround and Question
"If you think you have an agent provocateur, physically surround the offenders such that they cannot escape the necessary questioning: who are you, where are you from, who do you represent — and as much in-depth probing as possible."
Affinity Groups
Organize in small groups of people who know and trust each other. Strangers cannot easily infiltrate tight-knit groups.
Training in Advance
Conduct nonviolence training before any action. Everyone should know the plan and the discipline required.
Don't Always Expose Them
"Don't always expose agent provocateurs, because they may send replacements who you don't know. The agent provocateur that you know is better than the one you don't know."
Behaviors That Give Authorities a Pretext
NEVER Do These Things
Physical Actions to Avoid
- - Never throw anything — even water bottles, even in self-defense
- - Never push, shove, or physically confront officers
- - Never damage property — broken windows become the entire news story
- - Never carry weapons of any kind — including items that could be construed as weapons
- - Never wear masks with aggressive imagery — it feeds the "violent mob" narrative
- - Never run toward officers or enforcement personnel
- - Never attempt to physically stop an arrest in progress
Verbal Actions to Avoid
- - Never make threats — even vague ones, even in frustration
- - Never use violent rhetoric — no "fight," "war," "destroy," "burn it down" language
- - Never call for harm to specific individuals
- - Never engage in mob chanting that could be construed as threatening
Social Media Actions to Avoid
- - Never post threats or violent fantasies — they are monitored and will be used against the movement
- - Never share calls to bring weapons
- - Never share plans for illegal activities
- - Never post inflammatory content that could be screenshotted and used as propaganda
- - Never "joke" about violence — context is lost in screenshots
Organizational Actions to Avoid
- - Never associate with individuals or groups advocating violence
- - Never allow armed individuals at peaceful events
- - Never let unvetted strangers take leadership roles quickly
- - Never announce plans publicly that authorities could use to prepare provocations
"Opponents are generally better equipped to repress violent action than nonviolent action, and so will often attempt to provoke a nonviolent movement to violence."
— Gene Sharp, The Dynamics of Nonviolent Action
How to De-Escalate Tense Situations
When Facing Aggressive Officers
When Protesters Around You Become Agitated
When Violence Breaks Out Nearby
- - Move away from the violence immediately
- - Do not film violence up close — you could become part of it
- - Help others move away calmly
- - Do not chase or confront violent actors
- - If sitting, stay seated — this clearly separates you from violence
Phrases to Use
| Situation | What to Say |
|---|---|
| Calming agitated protesters | "They're filming. Don't give them what they want." |
| To someone about to throw something | "That's exactly what they want. Put it down." |
| To the crowd when tensions rise | "Sit down everyone! Let's sit!" |
| To officers | "We are peaceful. We are not a threat." |
| When someone suggests violence | "That helps them, not us. Let's stay smart." |
What Costs Movements Their Moral Authority
Loss Through Violence
Even single incidents of protester violence can define an entire movement in public memory. Property destruction particularly alienates potential supporters who might otherwise agree with the cause.
Loss Through Association
Movements that don't clearly distance themselves from violent factions or extremist rhetoric lose credibility with the broader public.
Loss Through Poor Messaging
Demands that seem unreasonable, rhetoric that demonizes opponents, or failure to articulate clear goals can erode support.
How to Maintain Moral Authority
- Immediately and publicly condemn any violence by supposed supporters
- Have clear, reasonable demands that the public can understand
- Show humanizing images — families, elderly, children participating peacefully
- Invite faith leaders, veterans, and respected community figures to visible roles
- Document and publicize government overreach — let them be the aggressors
- Tell personal stories — humanize those affected
- Maintain impeccable conduct even when provoked
"The strategic purpose of disciplined protest is to attract growing support for the movement and avoid acts that the public may see as violent and repulsive."
Legal Lines Not to Cross
Federal Crimes to Avoid
| Action | Legal Risk |
|---|---|
| Assaulting a federal officer | Up to 20 years in prison |
| Destruction of federal property | Up to 10 years |
| Conspiracy to commit violence | Even planning can be prosecuted |
| Inciting a riot | Federal crime if crosses state lines |
| Interfering with an arrest | Can result in arrest and charges |
| Threats against officials | Federal crime, actively prosecuted |
Actions That Are Protected
- Peaceful assembly
- Chanting slogans (non-threatening)
- Carrying signs
- Recording officers in public (know your state laws)
- Refusing to answer questions (beyond identifying information if required)
- Observing from a distance
- Providing legal support information to those being arrested
If Arrested
Meeting Emotional Needs Without Violence
"Anger and hatred are natural in response to atrocities, but it is essential to avoid causing physical harm, to maintain a nonviolent intention and commitment despite increasing government provocation."
Understanding the Impulse
Satisfying Actions That Maintain Discipline
| Instead of This | Do This |
|---|---|
| Throwing objects | Organize a massive die-in that blocks streets |
| Confronting officers | Human chains and linking arms |
| Destroying property | Creative art installations |
| Violent chants | Songs and music that build solidarity |
| Individual outbursts | Coordinated, dramatic symbolic actions |
| Rage posting online | Organizing real-world actions |
Immediate Tension Release
- - Deep breathing exercises practiced as a group
- - Call-and-response chanting that redirects energy
- - Singing together
- - Artistic expression (chalk, banners, projections)
- - Documentation and witness — feeling like you're doing something
Summary Checklists
Before Any Action
- Is everyone trained in nonviolent discipline?
- Does everyone know the legal support hotline?
- Have we vetted participants for provocateurs?
- Is our messaging clear and reasonable?
- Have we designated de-escalation leaders?
- Do we have a plan for if things get tense?
- Have we removed anyone advocating violence?
During Any Action
- Are we maintaining nonviolent discipline?
- Are we documenting (from safe distance)?
- Are agitated individuals being calmed or moved?
- Are we keeping hands visible?
- Are we ready to sit if violence starts?
- Are we clearly distancing from any violence?
After Any Action
- Have we publicly condemned any violence?
- Have we provided legal support to those arrested?
- Have we documented what happened?
- Have we debriefed about what worked and what didn't?
- Have we identified any provocateurs for future awareness?
- Have we taken care of participants' emotional needs?
Remember: Every action should be evaluated against one question: Does this help or hurt the cause?
Violence always hurts it.
Key Sources
- The Authoritarian Playbook for 2025
- Center for American Progress - Military Deployments Analysis
- Human Rights Watch - Sliding Towards Authoritarianism
- Waging Nonviolence - Agent Provocateurs
- International Center on Nonviolent Conflict
- Beyond Intractability - Gene Sharp's Research
- Harvard Kennedy School - Erica Chenoweth's Research
- War Prevention Initiative
- Waging Nonviolence - Nonviolent Discipline and ICE